When we do shotgun proteomics, we cut this region into a small piece and peptides phosphorylated once on the same region of that fragment coelute. It's often very hard, if not impossible, to tell which site is phosphorylated - or both.
Obviously we should do this without digesting them, right? The problem with that is that top down proteomics only really works on small proteins. If MEK1 was 16kDa, it would still be tough, but you could do it. MEK1 is almost 50kDa, though!
Enter "Individual Ion Mass Spectrometry" IIIMS? (older post explaining what that is here) and - what?? - ETD IIMS?
I was going to cut in parts of the materials and methods section here, but I don't want to intimidate anyone into thinking this is clearly just a proof of concept. However, I will say that the process to get to these data makes label free single cell proteomics look like a nice fun day (which it is NOT).
However, we have to start somewhere and being able to confidently localize 4 separate phosphorylation sites on a critically important protein this big - with anything - is a step in the right direction!
No comments:
Post a Comment