Okay, well, that looks grainy and useless, but if you are one of those "low sample input" people, you might also be looking for surfactant ideas!
We've all clustered around DDM because (so far, knock on wood) it doesn't seem to destroy everything. Longitudinal data would be nice and those of us using it to coat a lot of things will probably have some of that soon.
BUT THERE ARE MORE! And you can read about them in MCP here!
They seem to have one they like better than DDM, but they have to remove it from the peptides afterward, which....is less immediately interesting to me personally....
but I sure am glad to have a whole table of things to try!
No comments:
Post a Comment