As of February 22, authors submitting to MCP are no longer required to place their RAW data in a publicly accessible database. I don't know why the journal has made this decision, but I don't like it. Its simply too easy in this field to fabricate data. MCP still 'strongly encourages' the deposition of data, but I would prefer that it was mandatory unless particular stipulating conditions, such as patent rights were involved. Even in those cases I feel that the data should be deposited once those stipulations have expired or been resolved.
Friday, February 25, 2011
MCP changes policy on raw data
As of February 22, authors submitting to MCP are no longer required to place their RAW data in a publicly accessible database. I don't know why the journal has made this decision, but I don't like it. Its simply too easy in this field to fabricate data. MCP still 'strongly encourages' the deposition of data, but I would prefer that it was mandatory unless particular stipulating conditions, such as patent rights were involved. Even in those cases I feel that the data should be deposited once those stipulations have expired or been resolved.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)